This thesis examines the question of international responses to system criminality. It
argues that the assignation of moral responsibility, expressed in the act of prosecuting
individuals, expresses a fundamental conceptual shift towards an international polity.
Although political rhetoric, the media and international legislation express the moral
dimension of system criminality, the character of humanitarian law and the contingency
of its operation is the most concrete indicator of such a development. The status of an
embryonic international polity becomes particularly evident- with `individual
responsibility' being a criminally liable offence, as set against `collective responsibility'
which entails `civil', (non-penal) liabilities. However, the principle of individual
criminal responsibility, and therefore the expression of a nascent international polity, is
by no means as well developed as it may appear because the moral consensus necessary
to fully support this shift is still undeveloped. A thoroughly radical re-orientation to a
potential international polity had not fully arrived with the Nuremberg Principles and a
paucity of individual prosecutions for system crimes indicates the limits of this
development. Nevertheless, the contribution to knowledge of this thesis lies in its
finding that with the radical developments of criminal tribunals and the International
Criminal Court there has been a qualitative shift in the structure of international legal
norms.
Date of Award | 2002 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | |
---|
- Public Administration Law
- Law Enforcement Prisons
- System criminality
- War crimes
- Political science
Locating moral responsibility for war crimes : the new justiciability of 'system criminality' and its implications for the development of an international polity
King, S. J. (Author). 2002
Student thesis: PhD