The thesis looks at German-Polish relations and the changing practices of cross-border
cooperation in the 1990s. It reviews theories of border studies and argues that, in spite of
all change, border studies is part of a structure of power. The author analyses the
concepts of transgression and regression in order to describe the current constitution of
states, borders and practice. The example of German-Polish relations shows how this
constitution has changed throughout history, from a clear delineation of the Other to
increasingly European discourse, especially after 1989. Cross-border co-operation, the
author argues, has become integrated into the structures of power, has become a rule.
Using discourse analysis, the author presents the change of German and Polish discourse
on the Other. Traditional structures and historical stereotypes are combined with a new
structure in the discourse, which stresses co-operation and encounter. Actors in crossborder
co-operation are in a changed situation: their practices used to be defined as
acting against state structures, but have now undergone an incorporation in these political
and symbolic structures. The actors negotiate new, contradictory spaces for their actions:
supported by the state but partly uncomfortable with it, drawing on the new hegemonic
discourse of co-operation and trying to escape from it. Their practices, so the final
argument, can also inform the practices of border studies.
Date of Award | 2004 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | |
---|
Sponsors | Dudley Stamp memorial fund |
---|
German-Polish cross-border co-operation and the politics of transgression
Best, U. (Author). 2004
Student thesis: PhD