This research applied ideas from the cognition-emotion literature to some of the theories in
the OCD literature, and in so doing took'Va multi-dimensional approach to the
understanding of OCD. The aim of the study was to explore the nature of 'emotionalcognitive
profiles'^ of people with OCD,. and to compare these 'profiles' with those of
people with other anxiety disorders and people from a non-clinical population.. Participants
from the three groups i.e. an OCD group, ah anxiety group and a non-clinical group were
asked to rate a number of appraisal dimensions, in response to four vignettes. There were
10 participants in each group (N=30). The vignettes were constructed to evoke feelings of
anxiety, guilt, anger and pride. The responses of each group were then compared. The
results showed that when anxiety is evoked, both people suffering with OCD and people
suffering with other anxiety disorders, perceived more personal responsibility and more
harm to self than the non-clinical group. The OCD group also seemed to perceive more
personal responsiblity in the situation of guilt, which provoked discussion about the nature
and role of guilt and responsibility in the aetiology and maintenance of this disorder. The
results also led to some debate about the relationship between anxiety, depression and
OCD and finally, a formulation of OCD was proposed. The formulation was an attempt to
incorporate thinking from both cognitive and psychodynamic perspectives and to draw
together some of the theories and models of OCD, which had been discussed in the study.
Date of Award | 1997 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | |
---|
COGNITIVE APPRAISALS IN OBESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER & OTHER ANXIETY DISORDERS
MacCallam, J. (Author). 1997
Student thesis: PhD