This thesis concerns the intellectual heritage and autonomy of West European and American
industrial design as a discourse community at a moment when biotechnological developments
are challenging the certainty of what it means to be human. Proceeding from the assumption
that industrial design is an autonomous intellectual engagement played out through the
interpretation of technology as an artefact, the thesis identifies how this is a critical moment
for industrial designers, who appear to be unable to respond to a problem of the apparent
disconnection and the progressive displacement of the human in reference to technology. The
thesis identifies the cause of this as the understanding of the artefact, which has
conventionally been placed at the centre of its analysis. The way that this has been
constructed has not only impacted on design solutions but has led to a particular
understanding of technology. It is this understanding of the artefact that has ceased to be
sustainable and has precipitated the crisis. The thesis argues that, by revisiting the artefact as
a mutable consequence of culture, it is possible to relieve the problem by opening up the
scope for finding new methodological approaches. These can be used to develop design
strategies that are sufficiently subtle and coherent in their terms to engage with the open
complexity of future discussions of the distributed and enacted human.
Date of Award | 2008 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | |
---|
Artefacts, Technicity and Humanisation industrial design and the problem of anoetic technologies
Thompson, S. J. (Author). 2008
Student thesis: PhD