Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects

Patricia Kanngiesser*, Bruce M. Hood

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Young children often use simple rules of thumb to infer ownership of objects, but do they also understand ownership rights? We investigated whether 2- and 3-year-olds would react to violations of ownership rights in the context of newly made objects. In Experiment 1, children protested and made spontaneous reference to ownership when a puppet took away the child’s object, but protested little when a third party’s objects were at stake. Yet, 3-year-olds attributed ownership to the third party when asked ownership questions. Children’s ownership claims were due to the effort invested in making new things, as they rarely used ownership protest after having handled raw materials (Experiment 2). Two- and 3-year-olds thus showed an appreciation of ownership rights for their own newly made objects. While 3-year-olds understood third party ownership, they may have lacked the motivation to intervene in ownership rights violations involving a third party.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-40
Number of pages0
JournalCognitive Development
Volume29
Issue number0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this