Wound infiltration with bupivacaine after surgery to the cervical spine using a posterior approach

L. H. Pobereskin, J. R. Sneyd*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We have compared pain scores, morphine consumption and duration of stay for 50 adults who underwent elective cervical spine surgery via a posterior incision in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. During wound closure, the paravertebral muscles and subcutaneous tissues were infiltrated with 40 ml of saline (control) or 0.25% bupivacaine. There were no significant differences in pain scores, morphine consumption or duration of stay between groups. In view of the potential risks of wound infiltration in the cervical region, we consider that this practice should be abandoned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-88
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Keywords

  • Anaesthetic techniques, regional, paravertebral
  • Anaesthetics local, bupivacaine
  • Surgery spinal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wound infiltration with bupivacaine after surgery to the cervical spine using a posterior approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this