Why sedative hypnotics often fail in development

J. Robert Sneyd*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of reviewDrug development to support anaesthesia and sedation has been slow with few candidates emerging from preclinical discovery and limited innovation beyond attempted reformulation of existing compounds.Recent findingsThe market is well supported by low-cost generic products and development compounds have not been shown to improve patient outcomes or possess other distinctive characteristics to justify the cost of development.SummaryTo make progress in a large-volume, low margin and highly competitive environment requires meaningful advances in relevant basic science. Opportunities exist, but probably require bolder initiatives than further attempts at reformulation or fiddling with the structure of propofol. Extending development ambitions to include nonanaesthesiologist providers challenges professional boundaries but may facilitate cost-effective changes in patterns of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-397
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Keywords

  • anaesthesia
  • anaesthesiologist
  • hypnotic
  • opioid
  • propofol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why sedative hypnotics often fail in development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this