Which DEM is best for analysing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains?

Sarah J. Boulton^*
, Martin Stokes

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	168-168
Number of pages	187
Journal	Geomorphology
Volume	310
Issue number	0
Early online date	7 Mar 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2018

Access to Document

10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002

Boulton and Stokes MS final for OA pubLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Other files and links

Link to output in PEARL repository

Cite this

@article{693aa16e73834d63b452373b1a275224,

title = "Which DEM is best for analysing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains?",

author = "Boulton, \{Sarah J.\} and Martin Stokes",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002",

language = "English",

volume = "310",

pages = "168--168",

journal = "Geomorphology",

issn = "0169-555X",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "0",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which DEM is best for analysing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains?

AU - Boulton, Sarah J.

AU - Stokes, Martin

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/gees-research/456/

U2 - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002

M3 - Article

SN - 0169-555X

VL - 310

SP - 168

EP - 168

JO - Geomorphology

JF - Geomorphology

IS - 0

ER -