What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific?

IIT-Concerned, Derek H. Arnold, Mark Baxter, Tristan A. Bekinschtein, Yoshua Bengio, James Bisley, Jacob Browning, Dean Buonomano, David Carmel, Marisa Carrasco, Peter Carruthers, Olivia Carter, Dorita Chang, Ian Charest, Mouslim Cherkaoui, Axel Cleeremans, Michael Cohen, Philip Corlett, Kalina Christoff Hadjiilieva, Sam CummingCody A. Cushing, Beatrice de Gelder, Felipe De Brigard, Daniel C. Dennett, Nadine Dijkstra, Adrien Doerig, Paul Dux, Stephen Fleming, Keith Frankish, Chris Frith, Sarah Garfinkel, Melvyn Goodale, Jacqueline Gottlieb, Jake R. Hanson, Ran R. Hassin, Michael H. Herzog, Cecilia Heyes, Po-Jang Hsieh, Shao-Min Hung, Robert Kentridge, Tomas Knapen, Nikos Konstantinou, Konrad Kording, Timo L. Kvamme, Sze Chai Kwok, Renzo Lanfranco, Hakwan Lau, Joseph LeDoux, Alan L. F. Lee, Camilo Libedinsky, Matthew D. Lieberman, ... ..., Charles C.-F. Or, ... ..., Karen Yan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Theories of consciousness have a long and controversial history. One well-known proposal — integrated information theory — has recently been labeled as ‘pseudoscience’, which has caused a heated open debate. Here we discuss the case and argue that the theory is indeed unscientific because its core claims are untestable even in principle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-693
Number of pages5
JournalNature Neuroscience
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date10 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this