TY - JOUR
T1 - Validating a fully automated real-time PCR-based system for use in the molecular diagnostic analysis of colorectal carcinoma
T2 - A comparison with NGS and IHC
AU - Colling, Richard
AU - Wang, Lai Mun
AU - Soilleux, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Background Molecular testing is increasingly needed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and the current clinically relevant mutations are in BRAF, KRAS and NRAS. This study aimed to further validate a new alternative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) platform (Idylla, Biocartis) against existing next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. Methods 56 Idylla tests were performed on 43 CRC cases, in a total of 74 comparisons against an NGS panel (Ion Torrent) and the VE1 (anti-BRAF) antibody IHC. Discrepant cases were also compared with either conventional (Cobas) or droplet digital PCR (Bio-Rad). Results Idylla showed an overall concordance of 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%) with comparator molecular testing and indications were that Idylla is likely to be more sensitive than routine NGS. BRAF IHC showed 90% concordance with NGS (95% CI 70% to 97%). Conclusions This study validates Idylla in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CRC tissue. BRAF IHC, however, is an unreliable substitute for molecular testing in CRC.
AB - Background Molecular testing is increasingly needed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and the current clinically relevant mutations are in BRAF, KRAS and NRAS. This study aimed to further validate a new alternative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) platform (Idylla, Biocartis) against existing next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. Methods 56 Idylla tests were performed on 43 CRC cases, in a total of 74 comparisons against an NGS panel (Ion Torrent) and the VE1 (anti-BRAF) antibody IHC. Discrepant cases were also compared with either conventional (Cobas) or droplet digital PCR (Bio-Rad). Results Idylla showed an overall concordance of 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%) with comparator molecular testing and indications were that Idylla is likely to be more sensitive than routine NGS. BRAF IHC showed 90% concordance with NGS (95% CI 70% to 97%). Conclusions This study validates Idylla in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CRC tissue. BRAF IHC, however, is an unreliable substitute for molecular testing in CRC.
KW - Colorectal Cancer
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Molecular Pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021185825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204356
DO - 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204356
M3 - Article
C2 - 28292978
AN - SCOPUS:85021185825
SN - 0021-9746
VL - 70
SP - 610
EP - 614
JO - Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - Journal of Clinical Pathology
IS - 7
ER -