V: GENERAL DISCUSSION.

Caroline Floccia*, Thomas D. Sambrook, Luche C Delle, Rosa Kwok, Jeremy Goslin, Laurence White, Allegra Cattani, Emily Sullivan, Kirsten Abbot-Smith, Andrea Krott, Debbie Mills, Caroline Rowland, Judit Gervain, Kim Plunkett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ours is the first study to directly measure the relative contribution of linguistic distance to the acquisition of a bilingual toddler's two languages, which was the aim of Study 1. To address this question we tested 372 24-month-olds learning British English and one of 13 target Additional Languages. We found that a higher phonological overlap between these Additional Languages and British English led to higher levels of Additional Language CDI vocabulary production. Similar effects in comprehension were found for our other measures of linguistic distance, namely degree of similar in morphological complexity and word order. Importantly, linguistic distance contributed unique variance even when other key factors (proportion of English in child-directed input, proportion of English in parental overheard speech and gender) were entered into the same model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-80
Number of pages0
JournalMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Volume83
Issue number1
Early online date22 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'V: GENERAL DISCUSSION.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this