Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: A research agenda

  • Sandra J. Geiger*
  • , Hirotaka Imada
  • , Carya Maharja
  • , Nattavudh Powdthavee
  • , Valeria Vitale
  • , Lei Zhang
  • , Claudio D. Rosa
  • , Zenith N. C. Delabrida
  • , Kristian S. Nielsen
  • , Franz Essl
  • , Mathew P. White
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Environmental Psychology Unit, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
  • Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology, Japan
  • Department of Economics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • University of Vienna
  • Department of Psychology of Developmental and Socialization Processes, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
  • Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Development and Environment, State University of Santa Cruz, Brazil
  • Department of Psychology, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil
  • Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
  • Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Austria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Most people believe that biodiversity loss is human-caused, yet they may not realize how many others share this belief. Such collective misperceptions—known as pluralistic ignorance—may hinder individual and system changes required to address biodiversity loss. At the same time, reducing pluralistic ignorance may promote positive change. In this Perspective, we provide a brief overview of existing work on pluralistic ignorance about environmental topics and propose an agenda for impactful pluralistic ignorance research in the biodiversity domain. We highlight several research gaps and offer recommendations, including (a) investigating different forms of pluralistic ignorance, (b) improving our understanding of consequences and determinants, and (c) broadening the intervention toolkit to counter pluralistic ignorance for biodiversity conservation. To increase the Perspective’s practical applicability, we describe historical and contemporary case studies on pluralistic ignorance and biodiversity conservation from around the globe.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103043
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume95
Early online date6 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Keywords

  • Behavior change
  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Misperceptions
  • Pluralistic ignorance
  • Second-order beliefs
  • Social norm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: A research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this