TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a process of translational palaeoecology
T2 - A practical guide to research co-production
AU - Gauld, Jessica
AU - Fletcher, William J.
AU - Shuttleworth, Emma L.
AU - Akerman, Jane
AU - Angus, Morag
AU - Barrowclough, Conrad
AU - Bennion, Helen
AU - Blundell, Antony
AU - Bromwich, Dave
AU - Davies, Althea L.
AU - Dietl, Gregory P.
AU - Ezquerra, Francisco Javier
AU - Farrell, Michelle
AU - Flessa, Karl
AU - Froyd, Cynthia
AU - Fyfe, Ralph
AU - Gillard, Martin
AU - Gledhill, Robin
AU - Harper, Helen
AU - Higgins, Joanna
AU - Longden, Mike
AU - Martin-Puertas, Celia
AU - Morales-Molino, César
AU - Nicoli, Gautier
AU - Riedinger-Whitmore, Melanie A.
AU - Siggery, Ben
AU - Stewart-Rayner, Emily
AU - Stoneman, Rob
AU - Thomas, Beth
AU - Thomas, Nathan
AU - Wright, Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Palaeoecology has the potential to support practical conservation, offering a long-term perspective to issues such as biodiversity loss, environmental restoration and peatland carbon storage. However, achieving a widespread and effective application of palaeoecology within conservation practice requires greater and more efficient collaboration between academics, practitioners and policymakers. Translational palaeoecology offers a methodological approach to achieve collaboration between academia and conservation and produce palaeoecological research that can support and inform conservation action. This paper reports the results of a workshop involving academics undertaking palaeoenvironmental research and conservation practitioners concerning the barriers and practical recommendations for effective research-practice collaboration. The experiences of the participants highlight the benefits of a collaborative approach for producing palaeoecological research that is enriched with experiential and contextual knowledge. Key themes emerging from the workshop include the importance of mutual learning and knowledge exchange, and supporting practitioners to be co-researchers. Practical implication. The workshop outcomes are presented as a framework of practical guidelines for implementing translational palaeoecology. Key recommendations for academics include engaging with practitioner activities as relationship-building opportunities, utilising field visits for knowledge exchange, adopting a knowledge facilitation role or involving a facilitator to support practitioner understanding, using workshops to explore the practical relevance of palaeoecological data and enabling practitioners to communicate palaeo-research findings in their sphere. Key recommendations for practitioners include inviting academics to practitioner meetings, providing tacit and experiential knowledge throughout the process, exploring practitioner- or land-owner-led funding opportunities for translational research and partaking in communication roles for wider dissemination of research.
AB - Palaeoecology has the potential to support practical conservation, offering a long-term perspective to issues such as biodiversity loss, environmental restoration and peatland carbon storage. However, achieving a widespread and effective application of palaeoecology within conservation practice requires greater and more efficient collaboration between academics, practitioners and policymakers. Translational palaeoecology offers a methodological approach to achieve collaboration between academia and conservation and produce palaeoecological research that can support and inform conservation action. This paper reports the results of a workshop involving academics undertaking palaeoenvironmental research and conservation practitioners concerning the barriers and practical recommendations for effective research-practice collaboration. The experiences of the participants highlight the benefits of a collaborative approach for producing palaeoecological research that is enriched with experiential and contextual knowledge. Key themes emerging from the workshop include the importance of mutual learning and knowledge exchange, and supporting practitioners to be co-researchers. Practical implication. The workshop outcomes are presented as a framework of practical guidelines for implementing translational palaeoecology. Key recommendations for academics include engaging with practitioner activities as relationship-building opportunities, utilising field visits for knowledge exchange, adopting a knowledge facilitation role or involving a facilitator to support practitioner understanding, using workshops to explore the practical relevance of palaeoecological data and enabling practitioners to communicate palaeo-research findings in their sphere. Key recommendations for practitioners include inviting academics to practitioner meetings, providing tacit and experiential knowledge throughout the process, exploring practitioner- or land-owner-led funding opportunities for translational research and partaking in communication roles for wider dissemination of research.
KW - collaborative research
KW - knowledge co-production
KW - palaeoecology
KW - translational palaeoecology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014632681
U2 - 10.1002/2688-8319.70111
DO - 10.1002/2688-8319.70111
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105014632681
SN - 2688-8319
VL - 6
JO - Ecological Solutions and Evidence
JF - Ecological Solutions and Evidence
IS - 3
M1 - e70111
ER -