Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities

  • David Mouillot
  • , Laure Velez
  • , Camille Albouy
  • , Nicolas Casajus
  • , Joachim Claudet
  • , Vincent Delbar
  • , Rodolphe Devillers
  • , Tom B Letessier
  • , Nicolas Loiseau
  • , Stéphanie Manel
  • , Laura Mannocci
  • , Jessica Meeuwig
  • , Nicolas Mouquet
  • , Ana Nuno
  • , Louise O'Connor
  • , Valeriano Parravicini
  • , Julien Renaud
  • , Raphael Seguin
  • , Marc Troussellier
  • , Wilfried Thuiller
  • MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France. [email protected].
  • Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France. [email protected].
  • Marbec, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD Sète France
  • IFREMER, Unite Ecol & Modeles Halieut, Nantes, France.
  • FRB - CESAB, 34000, Montpellier, France.
  • National Center for Scientific Research
  • La TeleScop, Maison de la Télédétection, Montpellier, France.
  • Espace-Dev, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Univ Réunion, Montpellier, France.
  • Institute of Zoology
  • University of Western Australia
  • Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France.
  • CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Univ Paul Valéry, Montpellier, France.
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • University of Exeter
  • Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
  • PSL Université Paris, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The global network of protected areas has rapidly expanded in the past decade and is expected to cover at least 30% of land and sea by 2030 to halt biodiversity erosion. Yet, the distribution of protected areas is highly heterogeneous on Earth and the social-environmental preconditions enabling or hindering protected area establishment remain poorly understood. Here, using fourteen socioeconomic and environmental factors, we characterize the multidimensional niche of terrestrial and marine protected areas, which we use to accurately establish, at the global scale, whether a particular location has preconditions favourable for paestablishment. We reveal that protected areas, particularly the most restrictive ones, over-aggregate where human development and the number of non-governmental organizations are high. Based on the spatial distribution of vertebrates and the likelihood to convert non-protected areas into strictly protected areas, we identify 'potential' versus 'unrealistic' conservation gains on land and sea, which we define as areas of high vertebrate diversity that are, respectively, favourable and unfavourable to protected area establishment. Where protected areas are unrealistic, alternative strategies such as other effective area-based conservation measures or privately protected areas, could deliver conservation outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9007
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • Biodiversity
  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Vertebrates
  • Ecosystem

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this