Abstract
The smart city promises a new model of integrated urban design bringing together people, urban
spaces and smart technologies. The quote above highlights the question of not only who owns the
frameworks of the smart city but also more importantly who has access and what does this access
enable them to do. We need to ask carefully who is included and recognise that the smart city often
excludes the very people, communities and place it claims to help. The key is to establish how
marginalised or excluded groups may benefit – or not – in these initiatives. In order to do this we
need to think beyond digital infrastructures and consider how marginalised communities can reclaim
technologies at a place -based level. This requires thinking about not just the digital but also the
social infrastructure of smart cities. Drawing on Sassen’s model of ‘Open Sourced Urbanism’ we will
look at how communities themselves should decide on the problems they wish to address with
smart technologies, led by their own local concerns and interests, and with more informal modes of
social organisation. This may include initiatives such as living labs, car-sharing, community
currencies, hackerspaces, time-banks, tool libraries, and include how their city itself is designed,
integrated with technology and lived in, establishing digital places in streets, squares, libraries and
parks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Topos: The International Review of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 1 Apr 2023 |