TY - JOUR
T1 - The need, opportunities, and challenges for creating a standardized framework for marine restoration monitoring and reporting
AU - Eger, Aaron M.
AU - Earp, Hannah S.
AU - Friedman, Kim
AU - Gatt, Yasmine
AU - Hagger, Valerie
AU - Hancock, Boze
AU - Kaewsrikhaw, Ratchanee
AU - Mcleod, Elizabeth
AU - Moore, Abigail Mary
AU - Niner, Holly J.
AU - Razafinaivo, Frida
AU - Sousa, Ana I.
AU - Stankovic, Milica
AU - Worthington, Thomas A.
AU - Bayraktarov, Elisa
AU - Saunders, Megan
AU - Vergés, Adriana
AU - Reeves, Simon
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Marine ecosystems have been used, impacted by, and managed by human populations for millennia.
As ecosystem degradation has been a common outcome of these activities, marine management
increasingly considers ecosystem restoration. Currently, there is no coherent data recording format
or framework for marine restoration projects. As a result, data are inconsistently recorded and it is
difficult to universally track progress, assess restoration's global effectiveness, reduce reporting bias,
collect a holistic suite of metrics, and share information. Barriers to developing a unified system for
reporting marine restoration outcomes include: reaching agreement on a framework that meets the
needs of all users, funding its development and maintenance, balancing the need for ‘ease of use’ and
detail, and demonstrating the value of using the framework. However, there are opportunities to
leverage arising from the United Nation Decades of Ecosystem Restoration and Science for Sustainable
Development and with existing processes already developed by restoration groups (e.g. Global
Mangrove Alliance, Society for Ecological Restoration). Here we provide guidelines and a roadmap for
how such a framework could be developed and the potential benefits of such an endeavor. We call on
practitioners to collaborate to develop such a framework and on governing bodies to commit to
making detailed reporting a requirement for restoration project funding. Using a standardized marine
restoration monitoring framework would enable the application of adaptive management when
projects are not progressing as expected, advance our understanding of the state of worldwide marine
restoration, and generate knowledge to advance restoration methodologies.
AB - Marine ecosystems have been used, impacted by, and managed by human populations for millennia.
As ecosystem degradation has been a common outcome of these activities, marine management
increasingly considers ecosystem restoration. Currently, there is no coherent data recording format
or framework for marine restoration projects. As a result, data are inconsistently recorded and it is
difficult to universally track progress, assess restoration's global effectiveness, reduce reporting bias,
collect a holistic suite of metrics, and share information. Barriers to developing a unified system for
reporting marine restoration outcomes include: reaching agreement on a framework that meets the
needs of all users, funding its development and maintenance, balancing the need for ‘ease of use’ and
detail, and demonstrating the value of using the framework. However, there are opportunities to
leverage arising from the United Nation Decades of Ecosystem Restoration and Science for Sustainable
Development and with existing processes already developed by restoration groups (e.g. Global
Mangrove Alliance, Society for Ecological Restoration). Here we provide guidelines and a roadmap for
how such a framework could be developed and the potential benefits of such an endeavor. We call on
practitioners to collaborate to develop such a framework and on governing bodies to commit to
making detailed reporting a requirement for restoration project funding. Using a standardized marine
restoration monitoring framework would enable the application of adaptive management when
projects are not progressing as expected, advance our understanding of the state of worldwide marine
restoration, and generate knowledge to advance restoration methodologies.
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/bms-research/article/1748/viewcontent/Eger_20et_20al_20_2022__20accepted_20BiologicalConservation.pdf
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109429
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109429
M3 - Article
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 266
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - 0
ER -