The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire: Development, preliminary validation and findings.

M. E. Hyland*, R. C.M. Jones, K. E. Hanney

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Many chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are dissatisfied with the information they are given. A brief questionnaire completed prior to the clinical encounter would assist health professionals identify areas of information need. DESIGN: Ten focus groups of 59 patients assisted in the process of questionnaire construction. Three hundred and four patients (return rate 63%) responded to a postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-one per cent did not know the name of their disease, 3% reported medication non-compliance and 8% were confused with medicines. Fifty-five per cent of patients were exercising inappropriately, 8% did not know what to do when breathing worsened and 36% did not know when to call an ambulance. All six of the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire domains discriminated significantly as a function of health professional contact. Retest reliability for the six domains varied between .66 and .98, and for the total score was .89. alpha was .62. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can act as experts during the process of questionnaire construction. Information needs vary between patients but tend to be high for non-drug related aspects of self-management COPD. This questionnaire can be used to guide the clinical encounter.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1807-1816
Number of pages0
JournalRespir Med
Volume100
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire: Development, preliminary validation and findings.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this