The harms associated with simplifying our language choices, and the need for a new typology for dog breeders and consumers

‘Animal’ exploitation is not a new phenomenon. Whilst categorising ‘animals’ by broader groups rather than species helps us understand their experiences, our language still limits our ability to capture the nuances of their treatment. Dogs appointed as domesticated companions are subjected to a variety of experiences. Some are fed gourmet meals and taken to privately rented parks; and others suffer from the consequences of impulsive purchasing and physical abuse. This diversity in treatment is significantly determined by the intentions of the dog’s breeder and consumer. Subsequently, referring to all breeders and consumers with the same terminology instead of highlighting the possible suffering experienced simplifies our understanding, enabling the concept that dogs are protected from harm as man’s best friend to continue. Therefore, to improve our understanding of dog suffering and to reflect the harms that they are subjected to, a typology of dog breeders and consumers has been constructed.