The contemporary dérive: a partial review of issues concerning the contemporary practice of psychogeography

Phil Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:p> This article assesses aspects of the troubled and disputed practice of the dérive some half a century after its Lettriste inception. Rather than seeking to draw a ‘virtuous’ layer from the multiplicity of practices presently grouped around the category of ‘derive’, the article identifies generative properties in their contradictions and variegated connections. Particular attention is given to the spatial question, to the politics of the everyday and ‘anywhere’, to the limitations of aesthetic and occult psychogeographies — suggesting their dispersed and hybrid redeployment — and to the dérive as a socialized rather than individual practice. The article addresses the relationship of the dérive to relational aesthetic practices as a means to renew a connection with a critique of the spectacle, with the distributive trajectories of labour and capital, and with the creation of ‘situations’ in a society that has, for some time, accommodated them. </jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-122
Number of pages0
JournalCultural Geographies
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The contemporary dérive: a partial review of issues concerning the contemporary practice of psychogeography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this