Temporal dynamics of offline transcranial ultrasound stimulation

Cyril Atkinson-Clement*, David Howett, Mohammad Alkhawashki, James Ross, Ben Slater, Marilyn Gatica, Fabien Balezeau, Chencheng Zhang, Jerome Sallet, Chris Petkov, Marcus Kaiser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising non-invasive neuromodulation modality, characterized by deep-brain accuracy and the capability to induce longer-lasting effects. However, most TUS datasets are underpowered, hampering efforts to identify TUS longevity and temporal dynamics. This primate case was studied awake with over 50 fMRI datasets, with and without left anterior hippocampus TUS. We therefore amassed the highest-powered TUS dataset to date required to reveal TUS longevity and dynamics. Most of the effects were found in the TUS region itself and alongside the default mode and sensorimotor networks. Seed-based functional connectivity exhibited a time-constrained alteration which dissipated ∼60 min post-TUS. Intrinsic activity measure and regional homogeneity displayed extended diffusivity and longer durations. This high-powered dataset allowed predicting TUS using pre-stimulation features that can now extend to modeling of individuals scanned less extensively. This case report reveals the diversity of TUS temporal dynamics to help to advance long-lasting human applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100148
JournalCurrent Research in Neurobiology
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2025
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Neurology (clinical)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Keywords

  • ReHo
  • Seed-based connectivity
  • Ultrasound neuromodulation
  • fALFF

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal dynamics of offline transcranial ultrasound stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this