Style over Substance? A Review of the Evidence Base for the Use of Learning Styles in Probation Practice.

Jill Annison*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The implementation of the What Works agenda within probation has brought about the development and delivery of a suite of accredited programmes in relation to work with offenders. The accreditation criteria emphasize the evidence-based nature of these interventions and outline a number of key principles. An integral tenet of this approach has been ‘relevance to offenders’ learning style’. While most of the other aspects have been explored in research studies and publications, this element has tended to become a ‘given’ and while mentioned, has not been subjected to a similar level of critique. The recent publication of an evaluation of learning styles by the Learning and Skills Research Centre has provided an important overview and appraisal of this area, which is relevant to probation practice. This article draws together these various strands by outlining the changing situation in probation, reviewing the findings concerning learning styles and then developing an analysis of the wider implications for probation policy and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-257
Number of pages0
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusIn preparation - 1 May 2006

Keywords

  • Probation; Accredited Programmes; Evidence-Based Practice; What Works; Learning Styles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Style over Substance? A Review of the Evidence Base for the Use of Learning Styles in Probation Practice.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this