Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Science, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China – Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation

  • Peijie Wang*
  • , Fan Li
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Fudan University
  • Beijing International Studies University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy of Russia and China is studied in this paper from a policy foresight perspective and with regard to policy instruments, policy objectives, and policy implementation. A structural analytical framework is developed in this study specifically for STI policy analysis in these dimensions. Analyzing a database of 418 STI policies issued in the two countries, 25 policy variables have been scrutinized for the two countries vis-à-vis the three policy dimensions. The paper then maps and compares the two countries in STI policy instruments, objectives and implementation, adopting a positivist epistemology stance. Estimating a binary logistic model, Russia has been differentiated from China in their choice of policy instruments, their devotion to policy objectives and their approaches to policy implementation, revealing the differences and similarities between the two countries in the three STI policy dimensions. Deriving observable and corroborated evidence for STI policy perspectives in Russia and China, the results and findings help gain legitimate knowledge in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Article number120386
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume162
Early online date22 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China – Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this