Response of multi-metric indices to anthropogenic pressures in distinct marine habitats: The need for recalibration to allow wider applicability

Jayne E. Fitch*, Keith M. Cooper, Tasman P. Crowe, Jason M. Hall-Spencer, Graham Phillips

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sustainable exploitation of coastal ecosystems is facilitated by tools which allow reliable assessment of their response to anthropogenic pressures. The Infaunal Quality Index (IQI) and Multivariate-AMBI (M-AMBI) were developed to classify the ecological status (ES) of benthos for the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The indices respond reliably to the impacts of organic enrichment in muddy sand habitats, but their applicability across a range of pressures and habitats is less well understood. The ability of the indices to predict changes in response to pressures in three distinct habitats, intertidal muddy sand, maerl and inshore gravel, was tested using pre-existing datasets. Both responded following the same patterns of variation as previously reported. The IQI was more conservative when responding to environmental conditions so may have greater predictive value in dynamic habitats to provide an early-warning system to managers'. Re-calibration of reference conditions is necessary to reliably reflect ES in different habitats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-229
Number of pages10
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Pollution

Keywords

  • Benthos
  • Ecological indicators
  • Infaunal quality index
  • M-AMBI
  • Macrofauna

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response of multi-metric indices to anthropogenic pressures in distinct marine habitats: The need for recalibration to allow wider applicability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this