Relative proportions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons differ between accumulation bioassays and chemical methods to predict bioavailability

J. L. Gomez-Eyles; C. D. Collins; M. E. Hodson

doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012

Relative proportions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons differ between accumulation bioassays and chemical methods to predict bioavailability

J. L. Gomez-Eyles
, C. D. Collins
, M. E. Hodson

University of Reading

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Journal	Environmental Pollution
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012
Publication status	Published - 2010
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012

Cite this

@article{9b4b3ad2a56e407f9fd09e1dde31432d,

title = "Relative proportions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons differ between accumulation bioassays and chemical methods to predict bioavailability",

author = "Gomez-Eyles, \{J. L.\} and Collins, \{C. D.\} and Hodson, \{M. E.\}",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

journal = "Environmental Pollution",

issn = "0269-7491",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative proportions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons differ between accumulation bioassays and chemical methods to predict bioavailability

AU - Gomez-Eyles, J. L.

AU - Collins, C. D.

AU - Hodson, M. E.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.012

M3 - Article

SN - 0269-7491

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

ER -