Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regional Biomechanical and Topographic Changes after Transepithelial vs. Epithelium-off Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus: Updated Stress-Strain Index as a Superior Biomarker

  • BangXun Mao*
  • , ChangChang He
  • , Qian Ye
  • , WeiJia Liu
  • , Daniela Oehring
  • , YiQian Li
  • , YuKe Zhang
  • , XiaoMeng L
  • , ChenHao Zhao
  • , HongJie Hu
  • , JiaWei Gong
  • , HanHui Hou
  • , YuFeng Ye
  • , ShiHao Chen
  • , YiYu Li
  • , Ahmed Elsheikh
  • , FangJun Bao
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, WenZhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
  • University of Oxford
  • Department of Ophthalmology, Shaoxing People's Hospital
  • ZheJiang-United Kingdom Joint Laboratory on Ocular biomechanics
  • University of Liverpool
  • Wenzhou Medical University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare regional biomechanical and topographic outcomes between transepithelial (Epi-on) and epithelium-off (Epi-off) continuous accelerated corneal cross-linking (ACXL) in keratoconus. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Seventy-seven keratoconic eyes were included: 45 with Epi-on ACXL and 32 with Epi-off ACXL. Methods: All eyes underwent ACXL (10 mW/cm 2, 7.2 J/cm 2). Pentacam HR and Corvis ST measurements were obtained preoperatively (pre), and at 1 month (pos1m), and 6 months (pos6m) postoperatively. The SSIv2m, M, and J 0, J 45 were evaluated across central (0–3 mm), paracentral (3–6 mm), and peripheral (6–9 mm) regions. Correlated measurements were analyzed using generalized estimating equations for regional and longitudinal data, and generalized linear models for intergroup comparisons, with both absolute (Δ) and relative changes (Δ%) evaluated. Main Outcome Measures: Regional changes in SSIv2 m, M, J 0, and J 45 were analyzed across central (0–3 mm), paracentral (3–6 mm), and peripheral (6–9 mm) regions preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At 6 months, SSIv2 m increased significantly in all regions of the Epi-off ACXL group (greatest centrally), whereas the Epi-on group showed no consistent change. ΔSSIv2 m between preoperative and pos6m was significantly greater in Epi-off ACXL than Epi-on ACXL across all regions (central: P < 0.01; paracentral and peripheral: P < 0.05). Central flattening (negative ΔM) was significant in the Epi-off ACXL group (P < 0.001) and exceeded that in Epi-on ACXL (P < 0.001). No significant changes were detected in J 0 or J 45. Δ%SSIv2 m exceeded Δ%M in the paracentral and peripheral (paracentral: P < 0.01; peripheral: P < 0.05) regions after Epi-off ACXL. Conclusions: Epi-off ACXL induces stronger and more durable biomechanical stiffening and central flattening than Epi-on ACXL. Biomechanical parameters, particularly SSIv2, were more sensitive than curvature-based metrics for detecting regional treatment effects. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101246
JournalOphthalmology Science
Volume6
Issue number8
Early online date24 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Keywords

  • keratoconus
  • corneal cross-linking
  • ocular biomechanics
  • corneal shape
  • regional variation
  • Corneal shape
  • Keratoconus
  • Ocular biomechanics
  • Corneal cross-linking
  • Regional variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Biomechanical and Topographic Changes after Transepithelial vs. Epithelium-off Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus: Updated Stress-Strain Index as a Superior Biomarker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this