Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reflections on and recommendations from the OCEANIC study CYP and parent advisory group: a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement case study

  • Emma Popejoy*
  • , Julie Menzies
  • , Aysha Sheikhi
  • , Sally O’Loughlin
  • , Fred O’Loughlin
  • , Deborah Barker
  • , Rachael White
  • , Jos M. Latour
  • , Elizabeth S. Draper
  • , Philip Quinlan
  • , Jane Coad
  • , Joseph C. Manning
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • University of Leicester
  • University of Nottingham
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of the West of England
  • Young People’s and Parent Advisory Group Member
  • Fudan University
  • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is increasingly recognised as essential to the relevance, feasibility, and impact of paediatric intensive/critical care research. However, reporting of PPIE processes and outcomes, particularly in child health studies, remains limited, often lacking detail on sustained involvement and its influence across the research lifecycle. Case study: This case study presents the PPIE approach embedded within the OCEANIC Study, a multi-centre longitudinal mixed-methods investigation into the outcomes and support needs of children and families following paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) discharge. The study uniquely sustained engagement with a Children, Young People and Parent Advisory Group (CYPPAG) over eight years, aligning with the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) standards for public involvement. We detail the strategies used to foster inclusive, respectful, and impactful collaboration, including co-development of study materials, iterative feedback on recruitment and retention strategies, and involvement in qualitative data interpretation and dissemination. The advisory group’s contributions shaped study design, enhanced recruitment, and informed dissemination, including co-authorship and conference presentations. PPIE impact was explored qualitatively through CYPPAG feedback, tracking of study changes informed by the CYPPAG, and ongoing reflection within the research team. Conclusion: The OCEANIC Study demonstrates the feasibility and value of longitudinal, embedded PPIE in paediatric critical care research. It offers a novel model for sustained advisory group involvement, evidencing how meaningful collaboration can improve research relevance, rigour, and reach. This case study provides actionable insights for researchers seeking to integrate PPIE across the research continuum and highlights the therapeutic and empowering impact of involvement for contributors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number66
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date19 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 May 2026

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health (social science)
  • General Medicine
  • General Health Professions

Keywords

  • Children and young people
  • Longitudinal research
  • Paediatric critical care
  • Paediatric intensive care
  • Patient and Public Involvement Engagement
  • PPIE case study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on and recommendations from the OCEANIC study CYP and parent advisory group: a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this