Prognostic factors in second-line targeted therapy for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma after progression on an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor

  • Anne Sacré
  • , Philippe Barthé Lémy
  • , Clement Korenbaum
  • , Mickael Burgy
  • , Pascal Wolter
  • , Herlinde Dumez
  • , Evelyne Lerut
  • , Tine Loyson
  • , Steven Joniau
  • , Raymond Oyen
  • , Philip R. Debruyne
  • , Patrick Schöffski
  • , Benoit Beuselinck*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: About 40% of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) patients receive a second-line targeted therapy after failure of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (anti-VEGFR-TKI). Efficacy of second-line therapy is usually limited and prognostic and predictive factors at the start of second-line therapy are lacking. To identify the subgroup of patients that will benefit from such treatment remains a challenge. Methods: We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients who received a second-line therapy after progression on an anti-VEGFR-TKI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify prognostic factors for progressive disease (PD) as best response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on second-line therapy. Results: For the whole cohort of 108 patients, mOS from the start of second-line therapy was 8.9 months while mPFS on second-line therapy was 2.8 months. A total of 49/105 (47%) patients had PD, 50/105 (48%) stable disease (SD) and 6/105 (6%) a partial response (PR). On multivariate analysis, the following markers were associated with improved outcome on second-line therapy: a PFS on first-line therapy≥12 months (HR for PFS: 1.961; p=0.008) (HR for OS: 1.724; p=0.037) and Fuhrman grade 1-2 tumors (HR for OS: 2.198; p=0.007). Markers associated with poorer outcome on second-line therapy were: elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (HR for PFS: 0.511; p=0.04) (HR for OS: 0.392; p=0.017), low albumin (HR for OS: 0.392; p=0.01) and elevated corrected calcium levels (HR for OS: 0.416; p=0.01). The impact on OS of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) and International Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic scores as calculated at start of second-line therapy was validated in our patient series. Conclusions: Duration of first-line PFS, Fuhrman grade, serum LDH levels, albumin levels, corrected calcium levels and the MSKCC and IMDC scores calculated at start of second-line therapy are prognostic factors for m-ccRCC patients treated with second-line targeted therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-340
Number of pages12
JournalActa Oncologica
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors in second-line targeted therapy for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma after progression on an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this