Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Profiling cognitive–motor interference in a large sample of persons with progressive multiple sclerosis and impaired processing speed: results from the CogEx study

  • R. Veldkamp*
  • , M. D’hooge
  • , B. M. Sandroff
  • , J. DeLuca
  • , D. Kos
  • , A. Salter
  • , A. Feinstein
  • , M. P. Amato
  • , G. Brichetto
  • , J. Chataway
  • , R. Farrell
  • , N. D. Chiaravalloti
  • , U. Dalgas
  • , M. Filippi
  • , J. Freeman
  • , R. W. Motl
  • , C. Meza
  • , M. Inglese
  • , M. A. Rocca
  • , G. Cutter
  • P. Feys
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Hasselt University
  • UMSC
  • National MS Center Melsbroek
  • Kessler Foundation
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Newark
  • KU Leuven
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Toronto
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - Milano
  • University of Florence
  • Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM)
  • Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • University College London
  • Aarhus University
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
  • University of Genoa
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performing cognitive-motor dual tasks (DTs) may result in reduced walking speed and cognitive performance. The effect in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPMS) having cognitive dysfunction is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To profile DT-performance during walking in cognitively impaired pwPMS and examine DT-performance by disability level. METHODS: Secondary analyses were conducted on baseline data from the CogEx-study. Participants, enrolled with Symbol Digit Modalities Test 1.282 standard deviations below normative value, performed a cognitive single task ([ST], alternating alphabet), motor ST (walking) and DT (both). Outcomes were number of correct answers on the alternating alphabet task, walking speed, and DT-cost (DTC: decline in performance relative to the ST). Outcomes were compared between EDSS subgroups (≤ 4, 4.5-5.5, ≥ 6). Spearman correlations were conducted between the DTCmotor with clinical measures. Adjusted significance level was 0.01. RESULTS: Overall, participants (n = 307) walked slower and had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST (both p < 0.001), with a DTCmotor of 15.8% and DTCcognitive of 2.7%. All three subgroups walked slower during the DT versus ST, with DTCmotor different from zero (p's < 0.001). Only the EDSS ≥ 6 group had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST (p < 0.001), but the DTCcognitive did not differ from zero for any of the groups (p ≥ 0.039). CONCLUSION: Dual tasking substantially affects walking performance in cognitively impaired pwPMS, to a similar degree for EDSS subgroups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3120-3128
Number of pages0
JournalJournal of Neurology
Volume270
Issue number6
Early online date7 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Profiling cognitive–motor interference in a large sample of persons with progressive multiple sclerosis and impaired processing speed: results from the CogEx study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this