TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological demands of cyclists during an ultra-endurance relay race
T2 - A field study report
AU - Bescós, Raul
AU - Rodríguez, Ferran Agustín
AU - Iglesias, Xavier
AU - Knechtle, Beat
AU - Benítez, Adolfo
AU - Marina, Míchel
AU - Padullés, Josep Maria
AU - Vázquez, Jairo
AU - Torrado, Priscila
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This study was to describe and compare the physiological demands of ultra-endurance cyclists during a 24 h cycling relay race. Eleven male athletes (means ± SD: 34.8 ± 5.6 years; 71.6 ± 4.9 kg; 174.6 ± 7.3 cm; BMI 23.5 ± 0.5 kg/m 2 ; VO 2max : 66.0 ± 6.4 ml/kg/min) participated in the study; eight in teams with a format of four riders (4C) and three in teams with six riders (6C). To investigate exercise intensity, heart rate (HR) was recorded while cycling using portable telemetric monitors. Three different exercise intensities were defined according to the reference HR values obtained during a pre race laboratory incremental VO 2max test: Zone I (< anaerobic threshold [AT]), Zone II (between AT and the respiratory compensation point [RCP]), Zone III (> RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable (training impulse: TRIMP). The score for TRIMP in each zone was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this zone by a multiplier for this particular zone of exercise intensity. The average intensity did not differ between cyclists in 4C (means ± SD; 4C: 87 ± 3 HR max and 6C (87 ± 1% of HR max , despite the higher volume performed by 4C (means ± SD; 4C: 361 ± 65; 6C: 242 ± 25 per min; P = 0.012). These differences in total exercise volume significantly affected the values TRIMP accumulated (means ± SD; 4C: 801 ± 98, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 719 - 884; 6C: 513 ± 25, CI 95%: 451 - 575; P = 0.012). The ultra-endurance threshold of 4C and 6C athletes lies at about 87% of HR max for both. Although the intensity profile was similar, the TRIMP values differed significantly as a consequence of the higher volume performed by the 4C cyclists.
AB - This study was to describe and compare the physiological demands of ultra-endurance cyclists during a 24 h cycling relay race. Eleven male athletes (means ± SD: 34.8 ± 5.6 years; 71.6 ± 4.9 kg; 174.6 ± 7.3 cm; BMI 23.5 ± 0.5 kg/m 2 ; VO 2max : 66.0 ± 6.4 ml/kg/min) participated in the study; eight in teams with a format of four riders (4C) and three in teams with six riders (6C). To investigate exercise intensity, heart rate (HR) was recorded while cycling using portable telemetric monitors. Three different exercise intensities were defined according to the reference HR values obtained during a pre race laboratory incremental VO 2max test: Zone I (< anaerobic threshold [AT]), Zone II (between AT and the respiratory compensation point [RCP]), Zone III (> RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable (training impulse: TRIMP). The score for TRIMP in each zone was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this zone by a multiplier for this particular zone of exercise intensity. The average intensity did not differ between cyclists in 4C (means ± SD; 4C: 87 ± 3 HR max and 6C (87 ± 1% of HR max , despite the higher volume performed by 4C (means ± SD; 4C: 361 ± 65; 6C: 242 ± 25 per min; P = 0.012). These differences in total exercise volume significantly affected the values TRIMP accumulated (means ± SD; 4C: 801 ± 98, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 719 - 884; 6C: 513 ± 25, CI 95%: 451 - 575; P = 0.012). The ultra-endurance threshold of 4C and 6C athletes lies at about 87% of HR max for both. Although the intensity profile was similar, the TRIMP values differed significantly as a consequence of the higher volume performed by the 4C cyclists.
KW - Cycling
KW - Heart rate
KW - Intensity
KW - Performance
KW - Ultra-endurance
KW - Volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955131928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4077/CJP.2011.AMM065
DO - 10.4077/CJP.2011.AMM065
M3 - Article
C2 - 22135913
AN - SCOPUS:80955131928
SN - 0304-4920
VL - 54
SP - 339
EP - 346
JO - Chinese Journal of Physiology
JF - Chinese Journal of Physiology
IS - 5
ER -