Performative Apparatus and Diffractive Practices: An Account of Artificial Life Art

Jane Prophet*, Helen Pritchard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:p> Drawing on our own art/science practices and a series of interviews with artificial life practitioners, we explore the entanglement of developments at the artistic edges of artificial life. We start by defining key terms from Karen Barad's agential realism. We then diffractively read artificial life together with agential realism to discuss the potential for interventions in the field. Through a discussion of artificial life computer simulations, ideas of agency are problematized, and artificial life's single purposeful actor, the agent, is replaced by agential, an adjective denoting a relationship rather than a subject-object duality. We then seek to reinterpret the difficult-to-define term “emergence.” Agency in artificial life emerges through what Barad calls entanglement, in this case between observers and their apparatus, a perpetual engagement between observations of a system and their interpretations. The article explores the differences that this diffractive perspective makes to artificial life and accounts of its materialization. </jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-343
Number of pages0
JournalArtificial Life
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performative Apparatus and Diffractive Practices: An Account of Artificial Life Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this