TY - JOUR
T1 - Perampanel in routine clinical use across Europe
T2 - Pooled, multicenter, observational data
AU - Rohracher, Alexandra
AU - Zimmermann, Georg
AU - Villanueva, Vicente
AU - Garamendi, Iñigo
AU - Sander, Josemir W.
AU - Wehner, Tim
AU - Shankar, Rohit
AU - Ben-Menachem, Elinor
AU - Brodie, Martin J.
AU - Pensel, Max C.
AU - Di Gennaro, Giancarlo
AU - Maurousset, Aude
AU - Strzelczyk, Adam
AU - Rheims, Sylvain
AU - Rácz, Attila
AU - Menzler, Katja
AU - Bertol-Alegre, Vicente
AU - García-Morales, Irene
AU - López-González, Francisco Javier
AU - Toledo, Manuel
AU - Carpenter, Katherine J.
AU - Trinka, Eugen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 International League Against Epilepsy
PY - 2018/7/25
Y1 - 2018/7/25
N2 - Objective: To pool observational data on the routine use of perampanel to obtain information on real-world outcomes and data in populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Methods: Individual-level data of people with epilepsy treated with perampanel at 45 European centers were merged into a single dataset. Prespecified outcomes were: 1-year retention rate, 1-year seizure freedom rate (duration ≥6 months), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In addition, relationships were explored with logistic regression analyses. Results: The full analysis set comprised 2396 people: 95% had focal seizures; median epilepsy duration was 27 years; median number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was 2; and median prior AEDs was 6. One-year retention rate was 48% (1117/2332; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-50%), and 1-year seizure-free rate (≥6-month duration) was 9.2% (74/803; 95% CI 7-11%). Median treatment duration was 11.3 months (1832 patient-years); median dose was 8 mg. In 388 individuals with available data at 3, 6, and 12 months, responder rates were 42%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. During the first year, TEAEs were reported in 68% of participants (1317/1497; 95% CI 66-70%). Logistic regression found higher age at perampanel initiation was associated with higher seizure-free rate, and higher number of prior AEDs with lower seizure-free rate and lower rates of somatic TEAEs. In 135 individuals aged ≥65 years, 1-year retention rate was 48% and seizure-free rate was 28%. Significance: Across a large, treatment-resistant population, add-on perampanel was retained for ≥1 year by 48% of individuals, and 9% were seizure-free for ≥6 months. TEAEs were in line with previous reports in routine clinical use, and less frequent than in the clinical trial setting. No new or unexpected TEAEs were seen. Despite the limitations of observational studies, our data indicate that some individuals may derive a marked benefit from the use of perampanel.
AB - Objective: To pool observational data on the routine use of perampanel to obtain information on real-world outcomes and data in populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Methods: Individual-level data of people with epilepsy treated with perampanel at 45 European centers were merged into a single dataset. Prespecified outcomes were: 1-year retention rate, 1-year seizure freedom rate (duration ≥6 months), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In addition, relationships were explored with logistic regression analyses. Results: The full analysis set comprised 2396 people: 95% had focal seizures; median epilepsy duration was 27 years; median number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was 2; and median prior AEDs was 6. One-year retention rate was 48% (1117/2332; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-50%), and 1-year seizure-free rate (≥6-month duration) was 9.2% (74/803; 95% CI 7-11%). Median treatment duration was 11.3 months (1832 patient-years); median dose was 8 mg. In 388 individuals with available data at 3, 6, and 12 months, responder rates were 42%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. During the first year, TEAEs were reported in 68% of participants (1317/1497; 95% CI 66-70%). Logistic regression found higher age at perampanel initiation was associated with higher seizure-free rate, and higher number of prior AEDs with lower seizure-free rate and lower rates of somatic TEAEs. In 135 individuals aged ≥65 years, 1-year retention rate was 48% and seizure-free rate was 28%. Significance: Across a large, treatment-resistant population, add-on perampanel was retained for ≥1 year by 48% of individuals, and 9% were seizure-free for ≥6 months. TEAEs were in line with previous reports in routine clinical use, and less frequent than in the clinical trial setting. No new or unexpected TEAEs were seen. Despite the limitations of observational studies, our data indicate that some individuals may derive a marked benefit from the use of perampanel.
KW - antiepileptic drug
KW - elderly
KW - pharmacotherapy
KW - real-world evidence
KW - seizure freedom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052576911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/pms-research/article/2192/viewcontent/Epilepsia___2018___Rohracher___Perampanel_in_routine_clinical_use_across_Europe_Pooled_multicenter_observational_data.pdf
U2 - 10.1111/epi.14520
DO - 10.1111/epi.14520
M3 - Article
C2 - 30047129
AN - SCOPUS:85052576911
SN - 0013-9580
VL - 59
SP - 1727
EP - 1739
JO - Epilepsia
JF - Epilepsia
IS - 9
ER -