Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pelagic habitat: exploring the concept of good environmental status

  • Mark Dickey-Collas*
  • , Abigail McQuatters-Gollop
  • , Eileen Bresnan
  • , Alexandra C. Kraberg
  • , John P. Manderson
  • , Richard D.M. Nash
  • , Saskia A. Otto
  • , Anne F. Sell
  • , Jacqueline F. Tweddle
  • , Verena M. Trenkel
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • School of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Marine Scotland
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Institute of Marine Research
  • University of Hamburg
  • Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries
  • University of Aberdeen
  • Institut français de recherche pour l’exploitation de la mer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Marine environmental legislation is increasingly expressing a need to consider the quality of pelagic habitats. This paper uses the European Union marine strategy framework to explore the concept of good environmental status (GES) of pelagic habitat with the aim to build a wider understanding of the issue. Pelagic ecosystems have static, persistent and ephemeral features, with manageable human activities primarily impacting the persistent features. The paper explores defining the meaning of "good", setting boundaries to assess pelagic habitat and the challenges of considering habitat biodiversity in a moving medium. It concludes that for pelagic habitats to be in GES and able to provide goods and services to humans, three conditions should be met: (i) all species present under current environmental conditions should be able to find the pelagic habitats essential to close their life cycles; (ii) biogeochemical regulation is maintained at normal levels; (iii) critical physical dynamics and movements of biota and water masses at multiple scales are not obstructed. Reference points for acceptable levels of each condition and how these may change over time in line with prevailing oceanographic conditions, should be discussed by knowledge brokers, managers and stakeholders. Managers should think about a habitat hydrography rather than a habitat geography. Setting the bounds of the habitats requires a consideration of dimension, scale and gradients. It is likely that to deal with the challenges caused by a dynamic environment and the relevance of differing spatial and temporal scales, we will need to integrate multidisciplinary empirical data sets with spatial and temporal models to assess and monitor progress towards, or displacement from GES of the pelagic habitat.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1846-1854
Number of pages9
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume74
Issue number7
Early online date20 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology

Keywords

  • marine strategy framework directive
  • MPA
  • pelagic habitats
  • plankton
  • seascape

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pelagic habitat: exploring the concept of good environmental status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this