TY - BOOK
T1 - Peatland Restoration. Report to IUCN UK Peatland Programme.
AU - Lunt, Paul
AU - Allott, T
AU - Anderson, P
AU - Buckler, M
AU - Coupar, A
AU - Jones, P
AU - Labadz, J
AU - Worrall, P
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - The focus of this review paper is on peatland restoration, in particular what are the policies,present drivers and examples of best practice within the UK. The aim is to review opportunitiesand constraints to peatland restoration and make recommendations which could be used toinform future policy.Peatlands are wetlands in which restoration typically has three main aims. Firstly, to managevegetation more effectively to restore sites and their conservation features to favourablecondition; secondly, where feasible, to restore peat formation; and finally appropriatemanagement of water (chiefly peat wetness, but also water quality, runoff volume and timing)Vegetation management occurs on a continuum from the vegetation of bare peat, to projectsaimed at restoring appropriate plant community composition. In UK peatlands, targets forrestoration have largely focused on achieving favourable nature conservation status onprotected sites. In recent years, with the involvement of water companies and the movement upthe political agenda of peatlands as potential carbon stores, attention has focused on large arearestoration projects in the uplands. Results suggest that rewetting has been achieved by theblocking of 1000s of kilometres of drainage ditches. Considerable gains to biodiversity andreductions in carbon loss have been made over large areas by reduction in grazing animal stockdensities and removal of burning management. In upland and lowland peatlands, successfulrestoration following tree removal has been achieved where it has been possible to return thehydrological dynamics to the pre-plantation state. However in many afforested, drained andburnt over sites, oxidation and compression of surface peat layers has resulted in changes inhydrological function, increasing the risk of invasion from undesirable plant species and the lossof Sphagna.A major problem limiting what we know about the success of peatland restoration is theabsence of long-term monitoring data. Post restoration monitoring shows that recovery of waterlevels is possible in a relatively short time frame (2-5 years) Many restoration projects showshort term negative impacts on surface water quality and methane generation but, where dataexist, positive responses in the medium to long term. Restoration of target mire vegetation inresponse to management may take several decades to achieve with agriculturally improved andheather dominated peatlands presenting the greatest challenges. Restoring appropriateSphagnum species and cotton grasses is vital to restoring peat forming processes and securingUK peatlands as both secure long-term stores of carbon and also future carbon sinks.In addition to the literature, this review draws upon information gathered from the PeatCompendium and workshops involving expert consultees, which were carried out as part of thereview. During workshops there was a great deal of consensus on what could and could not beachieved using existing restoration techniques. Also presented within the paper are a series ofknowledge gaps and uncertainties. An important point of agreement was that the mostconvincing argument for the funding of future restoration projects could be made using themultiple objectives of carbon sequestration, water management and biodiversity gain. Howevera significant future challenge is to understand how various climate scenarios, such as increasedtemperatures, summer droughts and higher intensity rainfall events are likely to affectpeatlands. In particular it was agreed that the lowering of mean water tables and oxidation ofpeat are likely to result in increased growth and competition from vascular plants which, inmarginal climatic zones for peat formation, could make restoration to our current target conceptof blanket or raised bog difficult. A further significant point of agreement was the need to restore REVIEW Peatland Restorationpeat bogs to make them more resilient to climate change, to reduce rates of loss of biodiversityand carbon and to reduce loss of peat into water bodies.
AB - The focus of this review paper is on peatland restoration, in particular what are the policies,present drivers and examples of best practice within the UK. The aim is to review opportunitiesand constraints to peatland restoration and make recommendations which could be used toinform future policy.Peatlands are wetlands in which restoration typically has three main aims. Firstly, to managevegetation more effectively to restore sites and their conservation features to favourablecondition; secondly, where feasible, to restore peat formation; and finally appropriatemanagement of water (chiefly peat wetness, but also water quality, runoff volume and timing)Vegetation management occurs on a continuum from the vegetation of bare peat, to projectsaimed at restoring appropriate plant community composition. In UK peatlands, targets forrestoration have largely focused on achieving favourable nature conservation status onprotected sites. In recent years, with the involvement of water companies and the movement upthe political agenda of peatlands as potential carbon stores, attention has focused on large arearestoration projects in the uplands. Results suggest that rewetting has been achieved by theblocking of 1000s of kilometres of drainage ditches. Considerable gains to biodiversity andreductions in carbon loss have been made over large areas by reduction in grazing animal stockdensities and removal of burning management. In upland and lowland peatlands, successfulrestoration following tree removal has been achieved where it has been possible to return thehydrological dynamics to the pre-plantation state. However in many afforested, drained andburnt over sites, oxidation and compression of surface peat layers has resulted in changes inhydrological function, increasing the risk of invasion from undesirable plant species and the lossof Sphagna.A major problem limiting what we know about the success of peatland restoration is theabsence of long-term monitoring data. Post restoration monitoring shows that recovery of waterlevels is possible in a relatively short time frame (2-5 years) Many restoration projects showshort term negative impacts on surface water quality and methane generation but, where dataexist, positive responses in the medium to long term. Restoration of target mire vegetation inresponse to management may take several decades to achieve with agriculturally improved andheather dominated peatlands presenting the greatest challenges. Restoring appropriateSphagnum species and cotton grasses is vital to restoring peat forming processes and securingUK peatlands as both secure long-term stores of carbon and also future carbon sinks.In addition to the literature, this review draws upon information gathered from the PeatCompendium and workshops involving expert consultees, which were carried out as part of thereview. During workshops there was a great deal of consensus on what could and could not beachieved using existing restoration techniques. Also presented within the paper are a series ofknowledge gaps and uncertainties. An important point of agreement was that the mostconvincing argument for the funding of future restoration projects could be made using themultiple objectives of carbon sequestration, water management and biodiversity gain. Howevera significant future challenge is to understand how various climate scenarios, such as increasedtemperatures, summer droughts and higher intensity rainfall events are likely to affectpeatlands. In particular it was agreed that the lowering of mean water tables and oxidation ofpeat are likely to result in increased growth and competition from vascular plants which, inmarginal climatic zones for peat formation, could make restoration to our current target conceptof blanket or raised bog difficult. A further significant point of agreement was the need to restore REVIEW Peatland Restorationpeat bogs to make them more resilient to climate change, to reduce rates of loss of biodiversityand carbon and to reduce loss of peat into water bodies.
M3 - Commissioned report
BT - Peatland Restoration. Report to IUCN UK Peatland Programme.
ER -