Abstract
This paper comments on the arguments made in ‘knowledge without disciplines: a critique of social realism’s disciplinary fixation’, authored by Keith Barton. It is suggested that Barton has not fully grasped how social realism views disciplines and curricula and that this reflects a wider tendency amongst commentators to overlook some of the thinking underpinning social realism. A different, more generous interpretation of social realism is outlined in respect of disciplinarity, the constitution of knowledge, the relationship between disciplines and subjects and the socio-epistemic formation that make knowledgeability possible. Social realism is seen as having already made a substantive impact, with the potential to further extend its intellectual horizons.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-55 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Curriculum Studies |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Jul 2024 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
Keywords
- Social realism
- disciplines
- educational knowledge
- subjects
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the intellectual horizons of social realism: a response to Barton'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver