Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the ecological impact of prehistoric hunter-gatherers in Europe: Early Holocene (Mesolithic) and Last Interglacial (Neanderthal) foragers compared

  • Anastasia Nikulina*
  • , Anhelina Zapolska
  • , Maria Antonia Serge
  • , Didier M. Roche
  • , Florence Mazier
  • , Marco Davoli
  • , Elena A. Pearce
  • , Jens Christian Svenning
  • , Dave van Wees
  • , Ralph Fyfe
  • , Katharine MacDonald
  • , Wil Roebroeks
  • , Fulco Scherjon
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University
  • Durham University
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Université de Toulouse-Jean Jaurès
  • University of Versailles
  • Aarhus University
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • BeZero Carbon
  • MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre and Museum for Human Behavioural Evolution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted evidence of human impact on landscapes dating back to the Late Pleistocene–long before the advent of agriculture. Quantifying the extent of vegetation transformations by hunter-gatherers remains a major research challenge. We address this challenge by comparing climate-based potential natural vegetation cover with pollen-based vegetation reconstructions for the Last Interglacial and the Early Holocene. Differences between these datasets suggest that climate alone cannot fully explain the pollen-based vegetation patterns in Europe during these periods. To explore this issue, we used an upgraded version of the HUMan impact on LANDscapes (HUMLAND) agent-based model (ABM), combined with a genetic algorithm, to generate vegetation change scenarios. By comparing ABM outputs with pollen-based reconstructions, we aimed to identify parameter values that yield HUMLAND results closely matching the pollen-based vegetation cover. The updated ABM covers a broad temporal range, and incorporates the effects of hunting on herbivores and their influence on vegetation regeneration. The results show that the combined effects of megafauna, natural fires, and climatic fluctuations alone lead to vegetation cover estimates that are inconsistent with paleoecological reconstructions. Instead, anthropogenic burning played a key role, with modelling results suggesting that European landscapes were already substantially modified by humans by the Early Holocene. In scenarios where human-induced burning was minimal or absent, foragers still shaped landscapes indirectly through hunting, which influenced herbivore densities and their impact on vegetation dynamics. Our study revealed that Neanderthals and Mesolithic humans influenced similar-sized areas around their campsites and shared comparable preferences for vegetation openness. Our results challenge the assumption that pre-agricultural humans had minimal ecological impact. Instead, this study provides strong evidence that both Neanderthals and Mesolithic foragers actively shaped European interglacial ecosystems, influencing vegetation dynamics long before agriculture.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0328218
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume20
Issue number10 October
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Multidisciplinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the ecological impact of prehistoric hunter-gatherers in Europe: Early Holocene (Mesolithic) and Last Interglacial (Neanderthal) foragers compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this