"No language restrictions" in database searches: what does this really mean?

Karen Pilkington*, Anelia Boshnakova, Mike Clarke, Janet Richardson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the coverage of non-English journals by MEDLINE((R)) and EMBASE, the two major biomedical databases used for identifying studies for possible inclusion in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A series of searches were conducted to compare the coverage of journals in languages other than English. The results were compared against listings in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, an authoritative source of information on periodicals published in more than 200 countries. This study has highlighted the existence of a database coverage bias, in terms of the systematic exclusion of journals from certain countries and/or in certain languages. Searching that relies only on English language databases may result in failure to find many relevant studies published in languages other than English, irrespective of the research question and the avoidance of any language restrictions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-207
Number of pages0
JournalJ Altern Complement Med
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

Keywords

  • Abstracting and Indexing
  • Databases
  • Bibliographic
  • Humans
  • Language
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Publication Bias
  • Publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"No language restrictions" in database searches: what does this really mean?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this