Nitrous oxide: Are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies

K. De Vasconcellos, J. R. Sneyd*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This review considers the current position of nitrous oxide in anaesthetic practice and balances potential beneficial and disadvantageous effects. The classic adverse characteristics of nitrous oxide, such as diffusion hypoxia, expansion of gasfilled spaces, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, are often cited as reasons to avoid this old drug. Recent concerns regarding neurotoxicity, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and wound complications have further hardened many practitioners against nitrous oxide. New evidence and underpinning mechanistic data, however, suggest potential beneficial effects on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, and acute and chronic pain. While we await the outcome of large studies including ENIGMA-II, many clinicians have already decided against this agent. The authors argue that this abandonment may be premature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-885
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume111
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular diseases
  • Neurotoxicity syndromes
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Pain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrous oxide: Are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this