TY - JOUR
T1 - NGO Decision-Making During Typhoon Disaster Response
T2 - Towards a Relational Approach
AU - Cajilig, Pamela Gloria
AU - Nasser, Mona
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Asia Pacific Viewpoint published by Victoria University of Wellington and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2025/6/19
Y1 - 2025/6/19
N2 - This paper examines the decision-making processes of a non-governmental organisation (NGO) during Typhoon Odette (Rai) in Palawan, Philippines. The typhoon, which struck during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbated vulnerabilities in the province, leading to the destruction of homes and livelihoods, disruptions in education, fatalities and damage to critical infrastructure. Focusing on a health- and development-centred NGO, the qualitative case study draws from phenomenological approaches to decision-making and studies that emphasise relational ontologies. The discussion employs a framework that categorises decision-making into three types of processes that underscore the latter's entangled nature: ‘knot’ represents situations of confusion and desperation and where there is a lack of clarity on how to proceed. ‘Friction’ involves decision-making processes in which more-than-human forces impede the realisation of a clear path forward. Lastly, ‘flow’ signifies alignment of various dimensions, thereby facilitating ease in decision-making. The findings reveal that the NGO's decision-making during Typhoon Odette was dynamic, transitioning between knot, friction and flow. The study concludes with recommendations for NGOs, emphasising the importance of supporting decision-making flow and reducing avoidable friction and knots. The research contributes to understanding the complexities of NGO decision-making in disaster contexts, highlighting the need for flexible organisational models and transparent approaches.
AB - This paper examines the decision-making processes of a non-governmental organisation (NGO) during Typhoon Odette (Rai) in Palawan, Philippines. The typhoon, which struck during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbated vulnerabilities in the province, leading to the destruction of homes and livelihoods, disruptions in education, fatalities and damage to critical infrastructure. Focusing on a health- and development-centred NGO, the qualitative case study draws from phenomenological approaches to decision-making and studies that emphasise relational ontologies. The discussion employs a framework that categorises decision-making into three types of processes that underscore the latter's entangled nature: ‘knot’ represents situations of confusion and desperation and where there is a lack of clarity on how to proceed. ‘Friction’ involves decision-making processes in which more-than-human forces impede the realisation of a clear path forward. Lastly, ‘flow’ signifies alignment of various dimensions, thereby facilitating ease in decision-making. The findings reveal that the NGO's decision-making during Typhoon Odette was dynamic, transitioning between knot, friction and flow. The study concludes with recommendations for NGOs, emphasising the importance of supporting decision-making flow and reducing avoidable friction and knots. The research contributes to understanding the complexities of NGO decision-making in disaster contexts, highlighting the need for flexible organisational models and transparent approaches.
KW - civil society organisations
KW - decision-making
KW - disaster management
KW - disaster response
KW - NGOs
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008645967
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/pds-research/354/
U2 - 10.1111/apv.70002
DO - 10.1111/apv.70002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008645967
SN - 1360-7456
JO - Asia Pacific Viewpoint
JF - Asia Pacific Viewpoint
ER -