Nature of the evidence base and strengths, challenges and recommendations in the area of nutrition and health claims: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences

Margaret Ashwell*, Mary Hickson, Sara Stanner, Ann Prentice, Christine M. Williams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The regulation of health claims for foods by the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation is intended, primarily, to protect consumers from unscrupulous claims by ensuring claims are accurate and substantiated with high quality scientific evidence. In this position paper, the Academy of Nutrition Sciences uniquely recognises the <jats:italic>strengths</jats:italic> of the transparent, rigorous scientific assessment by independent scientists of the evidence underpinning claims in Europe, an approach now independently adopted in UK. Further <jats:italic>strengths</jats:italic> are the separation of risk assessment from risk management, and the extensive guidance for those submitting claims. Nevertheless, four main <jats:italic>challenges</jats:italic> in assessing the scientific evidence and context remain: (i) defining a healthy population, (ii) undertaking efficacy trials for foods, (iii) developing clearly defined biomarkers for some trial outcomes and (iv) ensuring the composition of a food bearing a health claim is consistent with generally accepted nutrition principles. Although the Regulation aims to protect the consumer from harm, we identify some <jats:italic>challenges</jats:italic> from consumer research: (i) making the wording of some health claims more easily understood and (ii) understanding the implications of the misperceptions around products bearing nutrition or health claims. <jats:italic>Recommendations</jats:italic> are made to overcome these challenges. Further, the Academy <jats:italic>recommends</jats:italic> that a dialogue is developed with the relevant national bodies about Article 12(c) in the Regulation. This should further clarify the GB Guidance to avoid the current non-level playing field between health professionals and untrained ‘influencers’ who are not covered by this Article about the communication of authorised claims within commercial communications.</jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-238
Number of pages0
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume130
Issue number2
Early online date12 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nature of the evidence base and strengths, challenges and recommendations in the area of nutrition and health claims: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this