TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicentre evaluation of two multiplex PCR platforms for the rapid microbiological investigation of nosocomial pneumonia in UK ICUs
T2 - the INHALE WP1 study
AU - INHALE WP1 Study Group
AU - Enne, Virve I.
AU - Aydin, Alp
AU - Baldan, Rossella
AU - Owen, Dewi R.
AU - Richardson, Hollian
AU - Ricciardi, Federico
AU - Russell, Charlotte
AU - Nomamiukor-Ikeji, Brenda O.
AU - Swart, Ann Marie
AU - High, Juliet
AU - Colles, Antony
AU - Barber, Julie
AU - Gant, Vanya
AU - Livermore, David M.
AU - O'Grady, Justin
AU - Tudtud, Eleanor
AU - Moore, Luke
AU - Mughal, Nabeela
AU - Singh, Suveer
AU - Roy, Alistair
AU - Sonksen, Julian
AU - Klein, Nigel
AU - Peters, Mark J.
AU - Chand, Meera
AU - Edgeworth, Jonathan
AU - Karlikowski, Michael
AU - Parry, Christopher
AU - Welters, Ingeborg D.
AU - Morton, Ben
AU - Leary, Tim
AU - Moondi, Parveez
AU - Tremlett, Catherine
AU - Williams, Helen
AU - Cuesta, Jeronimo
AU - Blunt, Mark
AU - MacK, Damien
AU - Martin, Daniel
AU - Brealey, David
AU - Horne, Robert
AU - Shallcross, Laura
AU - Turner, David
AU - Patel, Nehal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background Culture-based microbiological investigation of hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP or VAP) is insensitive, with aetiological agents often unidentified. This can lead to excess antimicrobial treatment of patients with susceptible pathogens, while those with resistant bacteria are treated inadequately for prolonged periods. Using PCR to seek pathogens and their resistance genes directly from clinical samples may improve therapy and stewardship. Methods Surplus routine lower respiratory tract samples were collected from intensive care unit patients about to receive new or changed antibiotics for hospital-onset lower respiratory tract infections at 15 UK hospitals. Testing was performed using the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (bioMérieux) and Unyvero Pneumonia Panel (Curetis). Concordance analysis compared machine and routine microbiology results, while Bayesian latent class (BLC) analysis estimated the sensitivity and specificity of each test, incorporating information from both PCR panels and routine microbiology. Findings In 652 eligible samples; PCR identified pathogens in considerably more samples compared with routine microbiology: 60.4% and 74.2% for Unyvero and FilmArray respectively vs 44.2% by routine microbiology. PCR tests also detected more pathogens per sample than routine microbiology. For common HAP/VAP pathogens, FilmArray had sensitivity of 91.7%-100.0% and specificity of 87.5%-99.5%; Unyvero had sensitivity of 50.0%-100.0%%, and specificity of 89.4%-99.0%. BLC analysis indicated that, compared with PCR, routine microbiology had low sensitivity, ranging from 27.0% to 69.4%. Interpretation Conventional and BLC analysis demonstrated that both platforms performed similarly and were considerably more sensitive than routine microbiology, detecting potential pathogens in patient samples reported as culture negative. The increased sensitivity of detection realised by PCR offers potential for improved antimicrobial prescribing.
AB - Background Culture-based microbiological investigation of hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP or VAP) is insensitive, with aetiological agents often unidentified. This can lead to excess antimicrobial treatment of patients with susceptible pathogens, while those with resistant bacteria are treated inadequately for prolonged periods. Using PCR to seek pathogens and their resistance genes directly from clinical samples may improve therapy and stewardship. Methods Surplus routine lower respiratory tract samples were collected from intensive care unit patients about to receive new or changed antibiotics for hospital-onset lower respiratory tract infections at 15 UK hospitals. Testing was performed using the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (bioMérieux) and Unyvero Pneumonia Panel (Curetis). Concordance analysis compared machine and routine microbiology results, while Bayesian latent class (BLC) analysis estimated the sensitivity and specificity of each test, incorporating information from both PCR panels and routine microbiology. Findings In 652 eligible samples; PCR identified pathogens in considerably more samples compared with routine microbiology: 60.4% and 74.2% for Unyvero and FilmArray respectively vs 44.2% by routine microbiology. PCR tests also detected more pathogens per sample than routine microbiology. For common HAP/VAP pathogens, FilmArray had sensitivity of 91.7%-100.0% and specificity of 87.5%-99.5%; Unyvero had sensitivity of 50.0%-100.0%%, and specificity of 89.4%-99.0%. BLC analysis indicated that, compared with PCR, routine microbiology had low sensitivity, ranging from 27.0% to 69.4%. Interpretation Conventional and BLC analysis demonstrated that both platforms performed similarly and were considerably more sensitive than routine microbiology, detecting potential pathogens in patient samples reported as culture negative. The increased sensitivity of detection realised by PCR offers potential for improved antimicrobial prescribing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129938982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216990
DO - 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216990
M3 - Article
C2 - 35027473
AN - SCOPUS:85129938982
SN - 0040-6376
VL - 77
SP - 1220
EP - 1228
JO - Thorax
JF - Thorax
IS - 12
ER -