Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Moving from symptom management to upstream plastics prevention: The fallacy of plastic cleanup technology

  • Melanie Bergmann*
  • , Hans Peter H. Arp
  • , Bethanie Carney Almroth
  • , Win Cowger
  • , Marcus Eriksen
  • , Tridibesh Dey
  • , Sedat Gündoğdu
  • , Rebecca R. Helm
  • , Anja Krieger
  • , Kristian Syberg
  • , Mine B. Tekman
  • , Richard C. Thompson
  • , Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez
  • , Anish Kumar Warrier
  • , Trisia Farrelly
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Moore Institute for Plastic Pollution Research
  • 5 Gyres Institute
  • Aarhus University
  • Cukurova University
  • Georgetown University
  • Roskilde University
  • Ozyegin University
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education
  • Massey University

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Plastic removal technologies can temporarily mitigate plastic accumulation at local scales, but evidence-based criteria are needed in policies to ensure that they are feasible and that ecological benefits outweigh the costs. To reduce plastic pollution efficiently and economically, policy should prioritize regulating and reducing upstream production rather than downstream pollution cleanup.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1442
Number of pages4
JournalOne Earth
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moving from symptom management to upstream plastics prevention: The fallacy of plastic cleanup technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this