Modelling the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine – a comparative study

Shimin Yu, Edward Ransley, Ling Qian*, Yang Zhou, Scott Brown, Deborah Greaves, Martyn Hann, Anna Holcombe, Emma Edwards, Tom Tosdevin, Sudhir Jagdale, Qian Li, Yi Zhang, Ningbo Zhang, Shiqiang Yan, Qingwei Ma, Bonaventura Tagliafierro, Salvatore Capasso, Iván Martínez-Estévez, Malin GötemanHans Bernhoff, Madjid Karimirad, José M. Domínguez, Corrado Altomare, Giacomo Viccione, Alejandro J.C. Crespo, Moncho Goméz-Gesteira, Claes Eskilsson, Gael Verao Fernandez, Jacob Andersen, Johannes Palm, Francesco Niosi, Oronzo Dell'Edera, Massimo Sirigu, Alberto Ghigo, Giovanni Bracco, Fuyin Cui, Shuling Chen, Wei Wang, Yueyue Zhuo, Yang Li, Christophe Peyrard, William Benguigui, Matthieu Barcet, Fabien Robaux, Michel Benoit, Maria Teles, Dimitris Ntouras, Dimitris Manolas, George Papadakis, Vasilis Riziotis, Zhiping Zheng, Weicheng Lei, Ruizhi Wang, Jikang Chen, Yanlin Shao, Jens Visbech, Harry B. Bingham, Allan P. Engsig-Karup, Yiming Zhou, Yefeng Cai, Haisheng Zhao, Wei Shi, Xin Li, Xinmeng Zeng, Yingjie Xue, Tiegang Zhuang, Decheng Wan, Gaspard Engel, Matthieu Tierno, Guillaume Ducrozet, Benjamin Bouscasse, Vincent Leroy, Pierre Ferrant, Gabriel Barajas, Javier L. Lara

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper summarises the work conducted within the 1st FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) Comparative Study organised by the EPSRC (UK) ‘Extreme loading on FOWTs under complex environmental conditions’ and ‘Collaborative computational project on wave structure interaction (CCP-WSI)’ projects. The hydrodynamic response of a FOWT support structure is simulated with a range of numerical models based on potential theory, Morison equation, Navier-Stokes solvers and hybrid methods coupling different flow solvers. A series of load cases including the static equilibrium tests, free decay tests, operational and extreme focused wave cases are considered for the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform, and the results from 17 contributions are analysed and compared with each other and against the experimental data from a 1:70 scale model test performed in the COAST Laboratory Ocean Basin at the University of Plymouth. It is shown that most numerical models can predict similar results for the heave response, but significant discrepancies exist in the prediction of the surge and pitch responses as well as the mooring line loads. For the extreme focused wave case, while both Navier–Stokes and potential flow base models tend to produce larger errors in terms of the root mean squared error than the operational focused wave case, the Navier-Stokes based models generally perform better. Given the fact that variations in the solutions (sometimes large) also present in the results based the same or similar numerical models, e.g., OpenFOAM, the study highlights uncertainties in setting up a numerical model for complex wave structure interaction simulations such as those involving a FOWT and therefore the importance of proper code validation and verification studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104441
JournalApplied Ocean Research
Volume155
Early online date28 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ocean Engineering

Keywords

  • Code comparative study
  • Floating offshore wind turbine
  • Hydrodynamic performance
  • Numerical and physical modelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine – a comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this