Medical audible alarms: a review.

Judy Edworthy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper summarizes much of the research that is applicable to the design of auditory alarms in a medical context. It also summarizes research that demonstrates that false alarm rates are unacceptably high, meaning that the proper application of auditory alarm design principles are compromised. TARGET AUDIENCE: Designers, users, and manufacturers of medical information and monitoring systems that indicate when medical or other parameters are exceeded and that are indicated by an auditory signal or signals. SCOPE: The emergence of alarms as a 'hot topic'; an outline of the issues and design principles, including IEC 60601-1-8; the high incidence of false alarms and its impact on alarm design and alarm fatigue; approaches to reducing alarm fatigue; alarm philosophy explained; urgency in audible alarms; different classes of sound as alarms; heterogeneity in alarm set design; problems with IEC 60601-1-8 and ways of approaching this design problem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)584-589
Number of pages0
JournalJ Am Med Inform Assoc
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2013

Keywords

  • Clinical Alarms
  • Equipment Failure
  • Humans
  • Sound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Medical audible alarms: a review.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this