Abstract
In the context of the growth in support for deliberative decision-making, this paper presents a new examination of an important and as yet largely ignored question of just how a deliberative process can capitalize on local knowledge and lead to shared (expert and public) learning and understanding. It speaks to both the academic and practitioner through a set of reflections upon the nature and demands of engagement management. Drawing upon a recent urban river restoration project in the UK, the subject of an innovative form of engagement, it identifies and examines the key management elements, i.e. the recruitment of representative interests; active facilitation; collaborative framing; optimizing interaction; and managing the unexpected. The paper concludes that both public and expert can learn if the right conditions for listening, sharing, reflecting on preferences and adapting are created and managed, and identifies the theoretical and practical implications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 172-181 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Human Ecology Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Keywords
- Deliberation
- Environmental decision-making
- Learning
- Public engagement
- Urban river restoration
- Water Framework Directive
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managing public engagement to optimize learning: Reflections from urban river restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver