Abstract
Does the tired oppositional debate between student-centredness and teacher-centredness leave the patient stranded, where the patient is surely the focus of a medical education? How might an authentic patient-centred practice be shaped, informed and nourished theoretically? We describe an intellectual landscape of critical, interdisciplinary inquiry that, so far, many medical educators have not inhabited. For example, texts written to inform medical education rarely examine intellectual premises and ideological implications. We offer a number of theoretical frameworks that can inform critical practice, asking 'why do we do it this way?'; 'what are the alternatives?'; and 'how do we justify our approaches intellectually?' We conclude that medical education needs to take stock of its intellectual resources.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 79-82 |
| Number of pages | 0 |
| Journal | Med Teach |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 0 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Curriculum
- Education
- Medical
- Humans
- Interdisciplinary Communication
- Learning
- Models
- Educational
- Patient-Centered Care
- Professional Practice
- Teaching
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Looking forward-looking back: aspects of the contemporary debate about teaching and learning medicine.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver