TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention
T2 - protocol
AU - Wheat, Hannah
AU - Weston, Lauren
AU - Oh, Tomasina M.
AU - Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah
AU - Ingram, Wendy
AU - Griffiths, Sarah
AU - Sheaff, Rod
AU - Clarkson, Paul
AU - Medina-Lara, Antonieta
AU - Musicha, Crispin
AU - Spicer, Stuart
AU - Ukoumunne, Obioha
AU - Allgar, Victoria
AU - Creanor, Siobhan
AU - Clark, Michael
AU - Quinn, Cath
AU - Gude, Alex
AU - McCabe, Rose
AU - Batool, Saqba
AU - Smith, Lorna
AU - Richards, Debra
AU - Shafi, Hannah
AU - Warwick, Bethany
AU - Lasrado, Reena
AU - Hussain, Basharat
AU - Jones, Hannah
AU - Dalkin, Sonia
AU - Bate, Angela
AU - Sherriff, Ian
AU - Robinson, Louise
AU - Byng, Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial. Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact. Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings. Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis. Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.
AB - Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial. Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact. Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings. Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis. Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.
KW - caregivers
KW - dementia
KW - personalised care
KW - primary health care
KW - realist evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172191195&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/pms-research/article/1335/viewcontent/BJGPO.2023.0019.full.pdf
U2 - 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
DO - 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
M3 - Article
SN - 1849-5435
VL - 7
JO - BJGP Open
JF - BJGP Open
IS - 3
ER -