Letter on “Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK”

Sarah Griffiths*, Lorna Manger, Rebecca Chapman, Lauren Weston, Ian Sherriff, Cath Quinn, Paul Clarkson, Caroline Sutcliffe, Karen Davies, Richard Byng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dear editors, We read with interest the recent article regarding the lack of inclusion of people who lack capacity in trials: ‘Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent in clinical trials in the UK’. As the authors so eloquently spotlight, those without capacity in many population groups are those who are likely to be most vulnerable to frailty, comorbidities and isolation. Their exclusion from research significantly limits the specific evidence base for their care. As a research team developing and evaluating a Dementia Support Worker intervention based in primary care, we appreciate the challenges of including people in complex dementia interventions research who are most likely to benefit from the intervention. We are mindful of one of five ‘Dementia statements’, developed by people living with dementia and grounded in Human Rights law: ‘We have a right to know about and decide if we want to be involved in research that looks at cause, cure and care for dementia and be supported to take part’
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages0
JournalTrials
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date21 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Letter on “Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this