TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Left with a title but nothing else’
T2 - the challenges of embedding professional recognition schemes for teachers within higher education institutions
AU - Spowart, Lucy
AU - Winter, Jennie
AU - Turner, Rebecca
AU - Burden, Penny
AU - Botham, Kathryn Ann
AU - Muneer, Reema
AU - van der Sluis, Hendrik
AU - Huet, Isabel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 HERDSA.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - With increasing moves globally towards the professionalisation of teaching in Higher Education, there is growing interest in the role of accredited professional recognition schemes that provide professional development for established university teaching staff. In the UK, There are now over 120 professional recognition schemes, resulting in institutionally focused evaluation studies examining their impact. This article contributes to this emerging body of work; it draws on cross-institutional data and Foucauldian theorising to address two important questions. In what ways does engagement with an institutional professional recognition scheme impact on participants’ teaching development, and how does institutional culture influence that engagement? The data illustrate that whilst institutional culture drives engagement, it did little to promote teaching development. Across the case-study institutions, neo-liberalism agendas were apparent. Some staff felt pushed to achieve professional recognition in response to the increasing use of metrics to measure the student experience and to inform institutional standing in league tables. Whilst evidence shows the process of seeking accreditation can lead to an enhancement in teaching practices, caution must be taken to ensure that the professional development opportunities offered by accreditation schemes are fully realised.
AB - With increasing moves globally towards the professionalisation of teaching in Higher Education, there is growing interest in the role of accredited professional recognition schemes that provide professional development for established university teaching staff. In the UK, There are now over 120 professional recognition schemes, resulting in institutionally focused evaluation studies examining their impact. This article contributes to this emerging body of work; it draws on cross-institutional data and Foucauldian theorising to address two important questions. In what ways does engagement with an institutional professional recognition scheme impact on participants’ teaching development, and how does institutional culture influence that engagement? The data illustrate that whilst institutional culture drives engagement, it did little to promote teaching development. Across the case-study institutions, neo-liberalism agendas were apparent. Some staff felt pushed to achieve professional recognition in response to the increasing use of metrics to measure the student experience and to inform institutional standing in league tables. Whilst evidence shows the process of seeking accreditation can lead to an enhancement in teaching practices, caution must be taken to ensure that the professional development opportunities offered by accreditation schemes are fully realised.
KW - evaluation of impact
KW - professional standards
KW - professionalisation of teaching
KW - Recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066048858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1616675
DO - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1616675
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066048858
SN - 0729-4360
VL - 38
SP - 1299
EP - 1312
JO - Higher Education Research and Development
JF - Higher Education Research and Development
IS - 6
ER -