Is there a long-term survival benefit with on pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

Nicola King*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A simple choice? Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become the gold standard of care for the treatment of coronary artery disease involving multiple vessels (1). This involves a choice as to whether to perform the surgery on (with cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB) or off pump (on the beating heart, without CPB). Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. On pump surgery provides a motionless operative field, but can be associated with a number of complications including myocardial ischemic injury, coagulation disorders, neurocognitive deficits, strokes and a systemic inflammatory response (2). In contrast off pump surgery avoids aortic manipulation and, although more technically demanding (2), has been helped by the invention of stabilizing devices (3). The debate as to which approach is superior has been raging for over 40 years. Indeed, an excellent example of the division in opinion is the conduct of 90% of CABG off pump in India (2) compared to only 20% worldwide (4) and 13% in the US and Canada (5).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-498
Number of pages0
JournalAnnals of Translational medicine
Volume0
Issue number0
Early online dateDec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a long-term survival benefit with on pump coronary artery bypass grafting?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this