Is penicillin allergy de-labelling about to find its place in UK antimicrobial stewardship strategy?

Neil Powell*, Mathew Upton, Bridie Kent, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Jonathan Sandoe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Penicillin allergy records are common, often incorrect, limit antibiotic treatment options and associated with patient and health system harm. The large numbers of patients with penicillin allergy records and the paucity of allergists have led researchers to explore non-allergist delivered assessment of penicillin allergy records and removal of those inconsistent with allergy (called de-labelling). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature concludes non-allergist delivery of penicillin allergy de-labelling to be safe and effective. Several countries outside Europe have endorsed non-allergist de-labelling and produced national guidelines and toolkits for de-labelling, but until recently the UK lacked such guidance. In September 2022 the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) produced their guidelines endorsing non-allergist delivered penicillin allergy de-labelling. These BSACI guidelines, coupled with the ongoing NIHR funded penicillin allergy de-labelling studies, will enable this important patient safety and antimicrobial stewardship intervention to become standard of care for NHS patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-77
Number of pages2
JournalClinical Medicine
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date17 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Keywords

  • antimicrobial stewardship
  • de-labelling
  • non-allergist
  • penicillin allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is penicillin allergy de-labelling about to find its place in UK antimicrobial stewardship strategy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this